Conflicting expert evidence on Ukrainian law adduced in English commercial appeal

The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal from the High Court, and determined that the English courts did have jurisdiction to hear a claim for over US$2 billion. The court considered the jurisdiction of the Ukrainian courts in determining the appeal, and received conflicting expert evidence on Ukrainian law. The judgment may be read here: […]

Provision of ‘primers’ for judges should reduce time and cost of expert evidence

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/neuberger-expert-witness-primers-will-cut-costs-/5101585.article “Speaking at the Expert Witness Institute’s annual conference yesterday, the Rt. Hon. Lord Neuberger said the judiciary was working with the royal societies of London and Edinburgh to produce primers for judges on topics such as DNA evidence and gait, where there is a clear consensus among experts. “

Sentence was ‘unduly lenient’ for expert witness who wrongfully amended report

Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd v Zafar [2019] EWCA Civ 392 (Court of Appeal, Sir Terence Etherton (presiding), 19 March 2019)  In this case, the Court of Appeal held that the sentence of six months, suspended, was unduly lenient for an expert witness found to have been in contempt of court by amending the substance […]